Saturday, July 4, 2015

Blood In; Blood Out Pt. 2

In my previous blog Blood In; Blood Out we heard about an interracial youth (Miklo) of Caucasian and Latino decent who identified himself as Chicano.  He joined the Vatos Locos street gang in South Central L.A. during the early 70s and was desperate to gain acceptance from his peers and family.  We also learned some scientific information about blood: its purpose, average amount in a human body, etc. 

4 Blood In Blood Out quotesLet’s continue by bringing closure to Miklo’s decision about La Una.  If you will recall, he was offered a conditional membership in La Una, the San Quentin Chicano gang, if he agreed to shed the blood of a high ranking Aryan Brotherhood member.  He would have one shot to carry out the hit but if he failed he was well aware he would be taken out.  Not taken out of the room or out to the woodshed, they meant they would kill Miklo if he failed the assignment.  I know there are fraternity initiations with conditions, but that is not this.  La Una had no grace and a low tolerance for mistakes.  The upside (if you can call it that) is Miklo didn’t have to come up with a plan of action, La Una took care of all of the details, explained them to him and ensured he had the appropriate weapon.  All he had to do was show up and carry out the plan.

Can you imagine the thoughts that must have been going through Miklo’s head after he made that commitment?  I would imagine he might have done what I do sometimes when I feel like I might have committed myself to something without fully weighing the options – like what did I just commit myself to?  How am I gonna pull this off?  Can I pull it off? OMG, etc. all of which can easily lead to self-doubt.  Generally I caution against self-doubt but this is definitely a time when I would have made an exception.  I would also imagine that during the time that led up to the day of the hit, he was filled with anxiety and “what-if” scenarios.  Shedding the blood of another human being is a big big deal. This was no small fete, Miklo was planning to take the life of a “made man” and there were consequences, not just the guilt associated with the act but torturous retaliation by an Aryan Brotherhood member if he was ever caught or “served up”.   

How does one justify taking another man’s life in order to be accepted by others? Now before you jump all over that statement let me clarify it.  The target wasn’t an innocent victim in the true sense of the word because he was a convicted felon serving time; a sinner who’s penalty is death according to Romans 6:23(NLT) For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life through Christ Jesus our Lord.  However, he was innocent in the sense that he had done nothing to Miklo to deserve death, and the wages or payment for sin is only to be paid by God, not other human beings. I realize the penitentiary has a completely different set of survival rules, some I am ignorant of and/or don’t understand but the bottom line was Miklo’s need for acceptance and protection within the La Una Familia.

This is a true story of the life of Jimmy Santiago Baca but now I want to change the focus to another true story about a man whose blood was shed innocently by the hands of others.  While Miklo, the Aryan Brotherhood made man and the character I am about to tell you about all come from different walks of life, the fact remains that innocent blood was shed as a result of a plot in both cases.  Here’s a high level view of the story:

There was a gang of little OGs (original gods-men) who were jealous of a young teacher, Jesus, who was radical in his thinking, approach, beliefs and lifestyle.  He refused to join their gang and conform to their traditional unethical way of thinking; challenged their system in every way imaginable, exposed their corruption and began to divide their followers.  Needless to say the little OGs were not happy campers.  They wanted Jesus to go along to get along like everyone else without questioning their methods because they were after all little OGs who believed no one had the right to doubt anything they said.  This gang of self-righteous, prideful men who viewed themselves superior to others and trusted their rules more than they did the rule maker.  They would: lie, steal, cheat and kill for power which is similar to the characteristics of the La Una Familia.

Jesus, who gained more popularity seemingly overnight and a following larger than any of the little o.g.s. could ever imagine, was well aware of their plans.  He taught his crew to stay alert and every cotton pickin’ time the little o.g.s. tried to set Jesus up, he always gave them the slip not because he was scared, but because it wasn’t time yet.  Jesus was miraculously smooth in everything he did, especially baffling the little o.g.s. but each time he did so their anger increased and enraged them.  Well not all of them because some of them secretly wanted to defect to The Other Side but they had spaghetti spines so they stayed put.  He used every situation that arose as teachable moments for his carnals (brothers closer than brothers) because he wanted to duplicate himself in them so their following could grow exponentially.

Jesus wasn’t lucky, he was intentional.  You see he volunteered for this assignment and knew in advance everything that was going to take place so nothing caught him off guard.  He knew who would betray him, deny him, when and that he would be offered as a sacrifice for the cause of grace and redemption.  The little o.g.s. didn’t know it but they were pawns in a much bigger plan, one which included the assignment that Jesus volunteered for.  While it is not my intention to compare Miklo to Jesus, there are some similarities.  Miklo had qualities that no one else had affording him the opportunity to go places others couldn’t; so did Jesus.  Miklo looked just like his father; so did Jesus; Miklo wanted acceptance of his familia, friends and peers; so did Jesus.  Miklo (at times) felt isolated, misunderstood, abandoned; so did Jesus; Miklo was willing to die for a cause; so was Jesus, but there’s a twist.

Earlier I mentioned that Jesus was on assignment by his Father, the original OG (One God) to save his people because the existing Law in place was not designed to be permanent and now the time had come for change.  The OG performed an extensive search for just the perfect person and couldn’t find one so Jesus eagerly volunteered (just as Miklo had done).  The OG created the perfect plan and provided all of the resources; all Jesus had to do was carry out the plan (of salvation).  Everything Jesus experienced well over 2000 years ago was designed so that he could ultimately be the blood sacrifice required.

Jesus sewed blood into the earth in order for his blood to get us out of bondage.  The bondage of sin and the affects that sin had/has over our lives.  Blood was required under the Old Testament Law and it was required under the New Testament of grace except it was required of one who was perfect and without sin.  What is sin?  It is breaking God’s law, his rules.  What is a sinner?  A person that habitually, intentionally breaks God’s law.  The blood, the precious blood of Jesus was required so that we could be forgiven and live abundantly according to John 10:10 (The thief enters only to steal, kill, and destroy. I came so that they could have life—indeed, so that they could live life to the fullest). 

Hebrews 10:18 (NLT): And when sins have been forgiven, there is no need to offer any more sacrifices.  Jesus paid it all, ONCE.

Romans 9:22-27 (NLT):  In fact, according to the law of Moses, nearly everything was purified with blood. For without the shedding of blood, there is no forgiveness.  That is why the Tabernacle and everything in it, which were copies of things in heaven, had to be purified by the blood of animals. But the real things in heaven had to be purified with far better sacrifices than the blood of animals. For Christ did not enter into a holy place made with human hands, which was only a copy of the true one in heaven. He entered into heaven itself to appear now before God on our behalf.  And he did not enter heaven to offer himself again and again, like the high priest here on earth who enters the Most Holy Place year after year with the blood of an animal. If that had been necessary, Christ would have had to die again and again, ever since the world began. But now, once for all time, he has appeared at the end of the age to remove sin by his own death as a sacrifice.  And just as each person is destined to die once and after that comes judgment, so also Christ was offered once for all time as a sacrifice to take away the sins of many people. He will come again, not to deal with our sins, but to bring salvation to all who are eagerly waiting for him.


Because of his undeserving Favor



Tania Not Tanya



.

No comments:

Post a Comment