In
our last declaration we discovered that Bildad who is described as the “traditionalist”
of the
group by most commentators pretty much picked up where Eliphaz left off
except his tone was a bit more aggressive to me. He insinuates that Job’s hypocritical
lifestyle has caused his own calamity and that his children were killed because
they too lived ungodly lives.
Have
you ever been in a situation where you knew you were innocent (not necessarily
of a crime, per se’) but the more you tried to explain or defend your position
the worse it appeared to get? I have and
it is utterly frustrating especially if your accuser already has it out for you
and/or they are set in their ways. I don’t
know about you but when I’m not feeling well I don’t have the grace to put up
with a lot of foolishness or rhetoric especially if it is something that is not
favorable. It’s best to talk to me when
I’m feeling like myself. Can you imagine
Job’s level of frustration?
In
Chapter 9 Job response to Bildad is far more courteous and gentlemanly than his
“traditionally religious” friend Bildad whose monologue was in my opinion harsh
and disrespectful no matter how well intended.
The bottom line is that Bildad was rude and I believe arrogant at least
in this instance because his message was not delivered with love and
humility. How can a person accept “truth”
from a rude messenger?
Job
first starts off by talking about the wisdom of God, a point that none of them
could argue and then he agreed with the general premise of Bildad’s message,
that God rewards the righteous and corrects (or judges) sinners. Not only was it true, it was a smooth move on
Job’s part because it disarmed the Three Amigos (Eliphaz, Bildad and Zophar) and stroked Bildad’s ego all at
the same time. Whether or not that was
Job’s intention is not clear but it doesn’t change the dynamic. Job obviously suffered more than normal; yet
no one could rightly accuse him of sinning more than normal. If Job was not righteous before God, then how could
any man be?
Because
we are dealing with the Patriarchal era it is important for me to reiterate righteousness
in two senses as I have done previously:
1.
A
“relative sense” as both Noah (Genesis
7:1 -- Next God said to Noah, “Now board the ship, you and all your
family—out of everyone in this generation, you’re the righteous one.) and
Job (Job 1:1 -- Job was a man who lived
in Uz. He was honest inside and out, a man of his word, who was totally devoted
to God and hated evil with a passion.) were so considered.
2.
A
“forensic sense” declared and considered righteous by God through faith (Romans 5:18-19 -- Here it is in a nutshell:
Just as one person did it wrong and got us in all this trouble with sin and
death, another person did it right and got us out of it. But more than just
getting us out of trouble, he got us into life! One man said no to God and put
many people in the wrong; one man said yes to God and put many in the right.
Job
knew far better than the Three Amigos that he was committed to the commitment. He walked the walk and talked the talk. People didn’t have to wonder if he was a man
of God (and I don’t mean a preacher either).
He lived out loud as an upright man before God. He was the priest of his home, he taught his
children to reverence and respect God, he interceded for his children, loved his
wife and though it was acceptable in his culture he had a monogamous relationship
with MJ (Mrs. Job). That lifestyle
carried over into his business as a fair employer. He gave wise counsel to countless people,
helped where he could and gave of himself.
He wasn’t about to allow his friends steal his testimony or guilt him
into thinking he was not what he knew he was, a righteous man of God. The bigger question to the Three was: “I don’t mean no harm fella’s but if I’m not
righteous before God then who is?” Don’t
be offended by that statement because it’s not arrogance, its assurance. Job understood that no one could debate with
God and though we can ask questions of God, we cannot ever demand answers. Consider Job’s statements;
· Job praised the
might of God and all of his splendor, creation – the sun, moon, stars, heavens,
mountains, etc. but that was no comfort to him because when he considered the
vastness of God’s creation it made him feel even more insignificant and more
distant than ever.
· Job agreed with
a second premise of Bildad that one is never blessed by hardening one's self
against God. Yet Job did not think that this principle applied to himself in
this situation, because he knew in his heart that he had not hardened himself against God.
· Job was well
aware of the great works of God in the universe, there was no arguing the
majesty and power of God but the greatness and might of God didn’t comfort Job;
it made him feel that God was too great to either notice or care. Mind you, Job’s perception of God was not the
truth, it was merely his state of thinking during these “discussions”.
It
almost seems like Job is crying out to his friends: “Why is God so hard to figure out?” But as far as they were concerned, God wasn’t
hard to figure out. The problem was
simple to them, Job had sinned in some bad and unusual way, therefore all this
disaster came upon him. Unfortunately for Job, he didn’t have Job 1:1-2 as a
point of reference like we do so he had to rely on his own heart and integrity
and he knew that God was not so simple to figure out.
I’m
out of time, we’ll have to pick up tomorrow but I want to close on this. Job was in a deep state of depression no
different than the Prophet Elijah (1 Kings 19) from the hit placed on him by
Jezebel and Jonah (Jonah 1) from warning the people of Nineveh to repent. The difference in the circumstances was that
they were both running from something. Job
wasn’t running but he was depressed no less and was in the midst of a full
blown pity party on the edge of bitterness, so clearly his friends counsel wasn’t
working. Lastly Job knew God as the
creator, not for his tender mercies nor did he have the advantage of knowing
the Messiah (God wrapped in flesh) as the Redeemer the New Testament, the great
High Priest or the Comforter, thus the loneliness was magnified by one million.
In
His New Excellence,
Tania
Not Tanya
No comments:
Post a Comment